Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādī Al-Madkhalī on Jarh wat-Ta’dīl & Shaykh Rabī’ Al-Madkhalī

Comments Off

Shaykh Muhammad bin Hādī Al-Madkhalī Explains that Shaykh Rabī’ bin Hādī Al-Madkhalī is from the Astonishing Affairs of our Times

[Q]: And this one asks: who possesses the knowledge of al-Jarh wat-Ta’deel in our present times?

[A]: As for whatever is related to narrations, then that has been documented in books and there is nothing left from that except for it to be studied.  As for whatever is related to innovation and criticizing its people and clarifying their condition, then this returns back to the Scholars – to the Scholars of the Sunnah – those who know the innovations, their rulings and the rulings upon their people.

And the more a person delves into this topic, the more he mixes with the people and reads their books and obtains knowledge of their positions, then he will be more knowledgeable about this topic.  For example, the early Imaams of hadeeth used to say, ‘Indeed, the knowledge of al-Jarh wat-Ta’deel is a difficult ascent.’  So the huffaadh (memorizers) are many and those who procure enough knowledge for ta’deel (appraisal) and tajreeh (disparagement, criticism) are few from amongst them.  And they have stipulated several conditions for the mujarrih (critic).  So from them:

  • He must be a memorizer of the narrations.
  • He must have memorized the avenues of disagreement.
  • He must be knowledgeable about the narrators, knowledgeable about their teachers, level after level and about their students and about the sources of their reports and other than that.

So once he has come to know these things, then having a vast memory and being familiar with the conditions of the people will aid him.  And he must adorn himself with taqwaa (righteousness) and wara’ (piety) and fear of Allaah.  So he must not have a predilection for desire and he must not be provoked by anger.  This is what they have mentioned with regards to the attributes of the mujarrih (critic).

So therefore, the Scholar who knows the people and he has mixed with the people, then he is the one who rules upon them, since he has knowledge of the people, in addition to his knowledge about the ahkaam (rules, regulations) of the Sharee’ah.  So he is given precedence in this.

And from the astonishing affairs I have seen in these times is our Shaykh, Shaykh Rabee’ (hafidhahullaah).  There has never been an individual mentioned to us that we were ignorant about and we asked him about this individual, except that he would say, ‘I have known him for twenty years, or thirty years, or forty years, or for fifteen years,’ and the likes of that.  He will bring you information about that individual in detail and he will explain that this individual has such and such and such a position, and we visited him at his place and in his land, or such and such has been mentioned to us, or we met in such a season and the likes of that.

So knowledge of the people in this manner is a distinct field.  Sometimes, you do not even fully know your neighbour who lives beside you for months.  You may not even know his name!  So this is a gift from Allaah the Blessed and Exalted.

Indeed, this has been testified for him.  Meaning, the one whose testimony is given consideration in this topic: Shaykh Naasir - rahimahullaahu ta’aalaa - said he is the flag bearer of the Sunnah in these times.  So he was from the most knowledgeable of the people concerning the hadeeth of the Messenger ﷺ. Rather, I do not know of anyone under the pillars of the heavens more knowledge about hadeeth in these times - rahmatullaahi ’alayhi.  And he testified for this man (i.e. Shaykh Rabee’), the Shaykh (i.e. Shaykh al-Albaanee) testified for his student. [1] So may Allaah have mercy upon Shaykh Naasir and may Allaah preserve our Shaykh, Shaykh Rabee’.

And we ask Allaah the Sublime and Exalted to grant all of us success. [2]

Endnotes:

[1]: Shaykh Muhammad Ibn ’Umar Baazmool said, “Shaykh al-Albaanee is a sign from the signs in these times with regards to hadeeth.  He described Shaykh Rabee’ as the flag-bearer of al-Jarh wat-Ta’deel in these times!!  So if this description was inapplicable, Shaykh al-Albaanee would have been the foremost of the people in opposing it and not applying it to a man living in these times, because he (i.e. al-Albaanee) is from the specialists in this field.”  Refer to the cassette, al-Ajwibatul-Manhajiyyah ’alal-As‘ilatis-Salafiyyatil-Leebiyyah.

[2]: This was taken from the first lesson of the author’s explanation of Nukhbatul-Fikr of Ibn Hajr.

Translation by Maaz Qureshi: http://sunnahpublishing.net/shaykh-muhammad-ibn-haadee-al-madkhalee-explains-that-shaykh-rabee-is-from-the-astonishing-affairs-of-our-times/

Audio: http://sunnahpublishing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/binhadiajaib.mp3

Shaykh Muqbil bin Hādī Al-Wādi’ī on Why They Fear al-Jarh wat-Ta’dīl

Comments Off

Translation by Maaz Qureshi: http://sunnahpublishing.net/shaykh-muqbil-ibn-haadee-al-waadiee-d-1421h-on-why-they-fear-al-jarh-wat-tadeel/

Audio: http://sunnahpublishing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/muqbiljwt.mp3

Endnotes:
[1]: This is the individual whom Imaam Muhammad Naasirud-Deen al-Albaanee (d.1420H) referred to as an “enemy of the Da’watus-Salafiyyah.”  Shaykh Muqbil said, “The one who abstains from al-Jarh wat-Ta’deel has abstained from the Sunnah.  So if there was no Jarh wat-Ta’deel, then the speech of the noble Scholar who calls to Allaah would be the same as the speech of ’Alee at-Tantaawee, and the same as the speech of Muhammad as-Sawwaaf, and the same as the speech of Muhammad al-Ghazaalee, or the same as Hasan at-Turaabee, or the same as ash-Sha’raawee, or the same as the speech of the Shee’ah and the Raafidah, or the same as the speech of the Soofee: Hasan as-Saqqaaf. No one abstains from this knowledge, except for a man who is ignorant, or a man who holds rancour in his heart, or a man who knows that he is majrooh (disparaged, criticized), so he diverts others from al-Jarh wat-Ta’deel, because he knows that he is majrooh.”  Refer to Fadaa‘ih wan-Nasaa‘ih (p. 115) of Muqbil Ibn Haadee.
[2]: Shaykh Muqbil said about his books that they are, “books of deviation and misguidance.”  Refer to Qam’ul-Mu’aanid (p. 504) of Muqbil Ibn Haadee.
[3]: Shaykh Muqbil - rahimahullaah - said about his famous book, al-Halaal wal-Haraam, “As for this one, then it is a disfigured book.  And it is a small book!  This demonstrates the scope of your knowledge.  If an individual were to write about the halaal and the haraam, then it would surely reach volumes.  Indeed, Shaykh al-Fawzaan has refuted it in a book that he called: Naqdul-Halaal wal-Haraam.”  Refer to al-Majroohoon ’indal-Imaamil-Waadi’ee (p. 103) of ’Aadil as-Siyaaghee.
[4]: Saheeh: Related by Aboo Daawood (no. 4252), ad-Daarimee in his Sunan (no. 209) and Ahmad in al-Musnad (no. 21888).  It was authenticated by al-Albaanee in Saheeh Sunan Abee Daawood (no. 3577).
[5]: Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 5685), Muslim (no. 2591), Aboo Daawood (no. 4792), at-Tirmidhee (no. 1996) and Ahmad in al-Musnad (no. 23586).
[6]: Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 5720).
[7]: Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 673), Muslim (no. 465), Aboo Daawood (no. 790), an-Nisaa‘ee (no. 835) and Ahmad in al-Musnad (no. 13778).
[8]: Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 30), Muslim (no. 1661), Aboo Daawood (no. 5157) and Ahmad in al-Musnad (no. 20291).
[9]: Related by al-Bukhaaree (no. 647), Muslim (no. 418), Maalik in al-Muwatta‘ (no. 414) and Ahmad in al-Musnad (no. 25348).
[10]: Shaykh Muqbil has stated about him, “You are nothing but an innovation and you come with innovation and you argue with misguidance.  And if Allaah so wills, we shall come out with a book entitled, Iqaamatul-Burhaan ’alaa Dalaal ’Abdir-Raheem at-Tahhaan (Establishing Evidence for the Misguidance of ’Abdur-Raheem at-Tahhaan).  So if only you would lower yourself and learn and study Saheehul-Bukhaaree and Muslim and Fathul-Majeed and other than those.”  Refer to Fadaa‘ih wan-Nasaa‘ih (p. 249).

Clarity in Manhaj & its Effects in Calling Others to Allaah – Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ramzaan al-Haajiree and Shaykh Saalih ibn Sa’d as-Suhaymee

Comments Off

 

This was a lecture delivered by the two noble and esteemed Shaykhs: Muhammad Ibn Ramzaan al-Haajiree and Saalih Ibn Sa’d as-Suhaymee – may Allaah preserve them both – on Tuesday, the 15th of Jumaadul-Oolaa 1432H, at Masjid Qubaa in al-Madeenah, the city of the Prophet.

The Arabic text can be found at the following link:
http://ar.miraath.net/books/woduh-almanhaj

The Arabic Audio can be found at the following links:
http://ar.miraath.net/audio/play/1898/file.mp3
http://www.box.com/s/5x2nrc2ue3f8mlxl6kth

The translation was rendered by Abu Yaseer Shareef and then edited by Abu Suhayl Anwar Wright; the PDF can be downloaded from the following link:
http://sunnahpublishing.net/modules/Manhaj/wuduhramzan.pdf

Synopsis:
Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Ramzaan al-Haajiree explains, with numerous examples from the Qur`aan, the authentic Sunnah and the narrations of the Salaf, how clarity in manhaj has aided the people in accepting the da’wah throughout the history of Islaam. Shaykh Saalih Ibn Sa’d as-Suhaymee commends the discourse and provides examples of how people have plotted to pollute the clarity of manhaj.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 5,862 other followers